Question: What is the relationship between self-grasping and self-grasping?

Shege Rinpoche replied: If an ordinary person as a Putegara has ego in his heart, he must have self-grasping; having self-grasping does not necessarily mean he has ego.

For example, if the obscuration of worries is there, the obscuration of knowledge must be there; if the obscuration of knowledge is there, it may not be that the obscuration of defilements is there; if the ego is present, the attachment of self-love is still there; if the attachment of ego is not there, the attachment of self-love is still there. Although the root of reincarnation is self-grasping, self-grasping is more difficult to deal with and more evil. There is a way of practice that is to remove the obstacles of troubles first, that is, to block the immediate and serious ones first, but the perceived obstacles are still there. In the same way, to block the more immediate and serious "self-grasping" first, but I love The attachment is still there.

Self-attachment is the inverted consciousness, the attachment above me. In the famous saying of attachment, I exist independently without relying on others.

I love persistence - it is also the famous saying that I am the most important, nothing else is important, I think myself is the most important. (For example, the sravakas believe that they are incapable of paying attention to others. If I choose, I choose myself first. Therefore, their renunciation is based on self-love and attachment.)

Only the correct view of emptiness can break this Self-grasping; the correct view of emptiness cannot destroy the self in the famous saying, because the self in the famous saying exists and cannot be broken. Only the Bodhicitta that is contrary to the self-loving attachment can break the self-loving attachment.