Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - Lecture notes on criminal law 6 reading notes
Lecture notes on criminal law 6 reading notes
Today, I read in the book "justifiable defense" that justifiable defense is an act to stop unlawful infringement in order to protect national interests, personal property and other rights of myself or others from ongoing unlawful infringement. This explanation is awkward. I was reading a book when my colleague came over. He explained to me what he understood as self-defense in plain language. Self-defense requires three elements. The first is to stop illegal activities in a legal way. Second, this matter must be in progress. The third is enough is enough. Then I went on to say that if it goes too far, it will become excessive defense. At the same time, he asked me why I should read this book. Do you want to take the exam? I said I wouldn't take the exam. I just found a teacher with the same values as me and wanted to read his books, that's all.

Justice Holmes said that the life of law is experience rather than logic, and legal persons should have the ability of logical reasoning, but more importantly, they should learn to listen to the simple voice of the people with an open mind. I think the teacher cited justice. Let me feel from my heart that he is on the side of the people. This is a kind and humorous teacher.

When we see social cases, we just need to bring ourselves in, imagine ourselves as defenders, and judge whether the behavior is appropriate from your standpoint and the experience of ordinary people. Seeing this sentence reminds me of the cesspit case he quoted in the mile mile? Imagine that if we were female victims, we would probably try to keep Zhang San from coming out of the cesspit.

Justice can never go beyond the constraints of social conscience, and law is not a cold provision. He must give consideration to nature and human feelings, and constantly seek the best balance among various interests. Seeing this poem, I was thinking, too. Every day at work, I am looking for a balance point to make my classes interesting, and at the same time, according to the requirements of exam-oriented education, let students master the most basic exam-oriented skills, find the balance point between administrative work and teaching work, and find the balance point between life and work. When looking at social cases in this section, are you used to thinking and judging rationally, or do you bring it into the position of the parties? To be honest, before reading this book, I think I should think and judge rationally. But after reading this book, I feel that when I read these things in the future, I will bring in the position of the parties. Because we are all ordinary people, maybe the next party in this situation may be you, me and him around us.

Emergency avoidance. Emergency avoidance is to protect national interests, personal property or other rights of oneself or others from ongoing dangers, and is not criminally responsible for the damage caused by emergency avoidance. By explaining the difference between emergency avoidance and justifiable defense. I know that the dangerous source of self-defense is unlawful infringement. Danger sources of emergency avoidance can be illegal infringement, natural disasters and other infringements. Self-defense is against unlawful infringement. There is a third person in emergency avoidance. The implementation conditions of emergency avoidance are negative, and self-defense is positive. I used to be very simple. In this book, I really saw that human nature is full of complexity and despicable places can be seen everywhere. However, in the process of educating students, I let the subject leader line up to share meals with the team members at noon every day. And tell students to put their ancestors before themselves. I want to do my best to let the students give sincere justice, fearlessness and sympathy from the heart. Let them know that responsibility is more important than happiness.

At the end of this chapter, ideological problem A was chased by gangsters and escaped into a dead end. In desperation, he jumped on Zhang San's motorcycle parked on the side of the road, then turned and chased the gangster with a knife, knocked him to the ground and escaped. However, due to despair, the motorcycle hit a telephone pole on the side of the road, causing damage to the body. Does A's behavior belong to self-defense and emergency avoidance? My understanding of behavior is self-defense. Because although there is a third person in this case, it is the motorcycle of the third person that is related.