This is a free expression of personal understanding. You can definitely say that I personally insist that I "would rather be the tail of a phoenix than the head of a chicken."

You can continue to elaborate: Napoleon had a famous saying: "A soldier who doesn't want to be a marshal is not a good soldier." Some soldiers said: I don't want to be a marshal, I just want to be a good soldier. What this soldier said is right, because among 100,000 people, only one person can be a marshal. Most people even think about it in vain. It is an unattainable goal. What I say must be right. The vast majority of people can only be the tail of a phoenix, not the head of a chicken.

There are three proverbs in China: Pigs push forward, chickens dig backwards, each has its own preferences; you walk your Yangguan Road, I walk my single-plank bridge; radish and cabbage, each has his own preferences. These words express that what I want to do is my freedom.

But you have to note that this is your personal opinion. rather than expressing group, trending opinions. If you want to represent a group as a refutation of a trending opinion, it's difficult.

Because "I would rather be the head of a chicken than the tail of a phoenix" has become a trending and conventional saying. Your rebuttal voice is very small, just like the voice of an oriole, no matter how beautiful it is, cannot cover the sound of the waves.

Individuals should have this clear understanding: as long as the voice of the yellow eu is recognized by others, it sounds good! That's it. There is no need for the speaker to drown out the sound of the waves.