Question 2: Which version of Warrior is the funniest? You must play the original version, provided that you play soldiers first: the heroes of World War II and the appearance of war (also called the truth of war) (the operation is certainly not as convenient as that of Warrior), followed by the red tide and guilty heroes in the Soviet campaign (without the allies and Germany, the red tide could not go online), and the commando team was made by DGM Company of the United States, because it did a good job (the main force was good and the scene quality was good, but the fighting mode was too simple) and winning the flag was a bit boring). Later, the two companies jointly produced the second generation. The five sides of the second generation campaign are similar, but they have broken through the single flag winning mode and can play encounters with computers. The latest update allows five countries to appear on a map at the same time.
Question 3: What do you think is funny, Warrior or Hero Company? I have mastered these two games, and I think each has its own advantages.
The war scenes in "Hero Company" may be better than those in the war, and "Hero Company" may be more popular. I won't say much about the introduction of the hero company. There are many online. Let me talk about my views on people in a state of war.
I think people in war are more real. As many introductions say, people in a state of war will form precise individuals, but they can also form a formation like Hero Company. Each unit has a project column. Whether weapons and soldiers match or not, the number of remaining bullets should also be paid attention to at any time, so sometimes you can't shoot indiscriminately, you can't rush hard, and you have to consider everything. Of course, you can also pick up weapons on the battlefield to supplement.
Unlike Company of Heroes, people in the war have no architectural elements. There are no base camps, infantry battalions and tank sheds in the game, but fixed personnel give you tasks (some customs can also ask for support). I think this is a different way of playing, which will make you feel that every soldier is very important.
For example, the second level of the Soviet Union, the task is to let you protect the train from leaving smoothly. At first, I felt that I had a lot of soldiers (about 100), so the defense should be very simple, but later I felt that there were not enough people, because your soldiers were playing less and less, and the enemy's attack was getting stronger and stronger. So I think the atmosphere of the warriors is much better and more compact.
In short, these two games are very classic. I think the picture of League of Legends is better, but people in the atmosphere of war have more feelings. Of course, if you have time, you might as well play both, because I like them very much.
Finally, I wish you a happy game!
Question 4: the truth of the war or the people of the war, which is fun but high ~! Personally, I think people in war are more fun ~! Although the truth of the war is more real ~! But it doesn't feel as good as Zhan Xia ~!
Question 5: Which version of Warrior is the funniest? There are two good ones: the original Warrior (Liu Xue's brother) and Red Tide. Mod can be added to the original, and with its own editor, red tide will not work. Mod has some super tanks and some missions. Last time I downloaded a modern zombie mod, it felt good.
Question 6: Is the war fun or does the hero company pay more attention to the overall situation and individuals? Otherwise, you will die.
Question 7: Which series of games is better, world of tanks or Warrior? What are their advantages? Personally, I think Warrior is good, so I will play this story with a good sense of picture, mainly because the operation is very complete and everything is available. You can try it, or you can look at the videos and pictures on the Internet.
Question 8: Which series is better, world of tanks or Warrior? What are their advantages? World of tanks is an online game, and Warrior is a stand-alone game, which can be modified, so world of tanks is more fun.
Question 9: Which is more fun, the man of war or the hero company? Which version has different types of anti-Japanese. The calculation of human injury in war is more realistic. Any weapon and everything can be killed at one time, and it doesn't matter how many times. The Companion of Heroes is an orthodox rts game, which is about blood. Even the powerful 88 guns can't kill a tank at once. Which is more fun depends on which type you like. Of course, if you like war games, then you should like both of them.
The content of anti-Japanese, the game itself is useless, but I don't know much about the people who fight, but the first generation of heroes who fight can play anti-Japanese mod, and I have played it, which is ok, so the people who fight should be able to do anti-Japanese content technically, and I believe some people in China are doing it. Hero company also has mod in the Far East battlefield, and the camp has the Japanese army of the Eighth Route Army, which is quite interesting to play.
Question 10: Old drivers, shame 1 and people in war. Are these two games fun? Although the War Man series and Hero Company series are real-time strategic games with the theme of World War II, they are very different.
"Man of War" is by far the most realistic game to simulate weapons of World War II and small-scale battlefield command, and the parameters of props and models are relatively comprehensive and real, but it will cause great hostility to novices and players unfamiliar with weapons of World War II, that is, it will cause gridlock under ordinary difficulty and the fighting speed is much slower than other games. Compared with Company of Heroes, its single-player task is simple and boring.
League of Legends is a game between truth and frankness. Although its weapon effect is basically unreal compared with the people in the war, its single-player mission campaign is wonderful and the plot is much richer.
Choose according to your own preferences.