For example, he opposes revolution and advocates moderate and gradual improvement, because he thinks revolution is a great destruction of productive forces. Moreover, China at that time, with its people's wisdom and uneducated citizens, could not really understand the true meaning of the revolution, but would become a tool used by some politicians. Therefore, he believes that under that national condition, the revolution will inevitably move towards autocracy, which has been proved by history.

Moreover, he advocated "new citizens" (that is, civilized citizens), developed industry, promoted capital accumulation, and then reformed the state system, thus forming a transitional stage more conducive to social development. This is contrary to Sun Wen's theory, so China didn't adopt his theory at that time, but wanted to go directly to democracy. Facts have proved that in the past 100 years, China took many detours, while Japan, Meiji Restoration.

As for the history of literature, some of his views are very original, so I won't give many examples here.

In a word, he is an enlightenment thinker and a true patriot. Although he supported the royalist system before the Revolution of 1911, he never supported the restoration after the founding of the Republic of China, because he believed that since the political system of * * * had been established, it could not go backwards, and "nothing in the world would change" should conform to the trend of the times.

He opposed the war because he knew that the people would be the ultimate victims, and he put himself in the people's shoes.

He advocates reform and improvement, but isn't China reforming now? This fully reflects its calmness and wisdom.