As the saying goes, "No rules, no Fiona Fang". A country, a nation, a family and a family (the latter two are weak in family rules) have no rules and are bound to be fragmented and chaotic. Around the 1990s, our country was facing a dangerous situation-there were signs of anarchy. What is "anarchy"? I don't know the academic explanation, but there is absolutely no problem to explain it with "Fiona Fang was made without rules and regulations". Fortunately, our national leaders are keenly aware of this sign and have curbed its spread. In fact, up to now, there are still many young people (including many rotten old men) who say that it would be nice if there were no government! How free! No taxes! No jail time! Don't be bound! Is that really the case? No, if there really is no government, of course we will not be free. No tax is the biggest tax (paper money is actually useless), the country is a prison, and chaos is a constraint. Think about Iraq now.

My mind is full of imagination, and now I think of our home-Netease circle of educational storm. Education storm is an open network circle that cares about education, pays attention to education and serves education. Although it is open, it can't be without rules! I don't know. Have you seen other circles of Netease? Few people have defined the rules of this circle. You might say, don't many circles prosper without rules? There are tens of thousands of friends in the circle and thousands of hits every day. But I asked, does it matter? How much have you gained from it? Is it helpful to solve social problems? Is it good for everyone to acquire knowledge? Moreover, I also want to tell you that the reason why these circles are booming is actually a hidden rule. This rule is just not clear (of course, many of them are suspected of hype). Ok, let's not criticize others too much. The key is to reflect on yourself. The key is that we can bring positive and optimistic things to society, not the other way around.

"No rules, no Fiona Fang" is a famous saying, which we should deeply understand and practice. Based on this understanding, since I started to educate the storm circle, I have been trying to build the rules of the circle, which is a basic construction and a long-term plan. But "rules" are also a very strange thing. Only when everyone agrees that this is a rule and something that everyone must abide by can it work. Therefore, this rule cannot be arbitrary or arbitrary. It must be established by all of us, recognized and observed after it is established. In fact, this is the most real explanation of "openness". Based on this, in the process of constructing the educational storm circle, I once invited my circle friends to participate in discussing the important issues of the circle-circle positioning, circle log classification positioning, circle management circle transaction description and so on. But in this process, the enthusiasm of the circle friends is not very high, and I can only put forward tentative "rules". I hope everyone will discuss and abide by it in the discussion and improve it through observation. This is actually an "open" performance. However, such a process is very difficult, and it is bound to go through a lot of friction and hardships to establish rules. With this rule, the circle can develop smoothly and play its social effect. In this sense, "you can't see the rainbow without suffering."