People who have no feelings for children are not necessarily real heroes. How can it be that caring about children is not a gentleman?

Source: Lu Xun's Answering the Guest

Original poem:

Ruthlessness may not be a real hero, so how can Reiko Kobayakawa not be a husband?

Do you know that those noisy people look back smaller than Tu?

Translation:

People who have no feelings for children are not necessarily real heroes. If you love your children, how can you not be a gentleman?

Do you know that tigers howling in the mountains always come back to look after their cubs?

Extended data:

"Ruthlessness is not necessarily a true hero. How can Reiko Kobayakawa not be a husband?" It is solid and powerful, with irrefutable power, and it is a famous sentence widely circulated. The author didn't tell the story with pen and ink. From the beginning, he argued eloquently with philosophical poems that "heartless" people may not be real heroes, but "Reiko Kobayakawa" people may be courageous people.

The poem strongly retaliates against those critics who play with "sentimentality" and "ruthlessness" abstractly, and seriously points out that those who boo themselves with "ruthlessness" are not heroes, and it is even meaner to show their ruthlessness by attacking others' "Reiko Kobayakawa".

Baidu Encyclopedia-Answer the question