Current location - Quotes Website - Personality signature - The difference between Jordan ghosting and Xtep
The difference between Jordan ghosting and Xtep
160x, the thickness of the midsole is 24mm in the forefoot and 30mm in the hindfoot. The official weight of yard 42 (with an inner length of 265mm) is 193g, and the measured weight is 189g. The price is 899, and the current secondary market price is around 700;

Pb is in Fei Ying, and the thickness of the midsole is 28mm for the forefoot and 36mm for the hindfoot (according to the rough measurement results, the height of the hindfoot of Fei Ying is 3 1-32mm in the view of Chamotte, Weibo), and the official weight of 42 yards (with an inner length of 265mm) is 178g, which is actually measured as178g/A6Ud9cg. The price is 799, and the current secondary market price is more than 550 to 600.

Start with vampires. Jordan shoe last is wider, while 160x upper is wider, and the length of shoes is somewhat larger, but they can all be purchased according to the standard of inner length = foot length.

Simply talking about the feeling of the upper, there is no doubt that I prefer 160x. People with not wide feet may object because the package is not enough. A more breathable opening, a firmer toe reinforcement and heel port treasure, and a richer filler all add up to make 160x more breathable, more comfortable and more foot-locked, without any pressure on the feet, and the integration of the feet is very good. At the same time, the shoelace system is more reasonable-mainly because the length of shoelace is enough and the friction resistance between shoelace hole and shoelace is small, so it is not troublesome to loosen shoelace.

On the other hand, Fei Ying pb, except for its excellent wrapping, can only say that the other parts of the upper have passed the standard-barely enough, and the chain will not fall off. Basically, only by using the last shoelace hole can we barely keep the heel from slipping. When adjusting shoelaces, the rough feel and the elongated length of shoelaces test patience very much. It may be because the application of large-area mono yarn will make Fei Ying pb perform better in fighting rain than 160x, but after all, fighting rain is rare, and most shoes are used in sunny days.

As for the outsole, I think there is no suspense. Whether the road surface is dry or wet, the overall grip performance of 160x is similar to that of new Fei Ying pb even after grain polishing. The wear resistance of 160x has been tested for a long time, and Fei Ying pb still needs a plate.

The midsole is the highlight. Fei Ying pb is about 5mm thicker than 160x, the midsole is too high, the midfoot and hind paw are narrowed, and there is no supporting design combined with the thin mono yarn upper, which makes the stability of Fei Ying pb poor and the ankle has not laid a good foundation for strength. However, the 160x midsole is not that thick, and the width of the back palm is larger. At the same time, the carbon plate has a supporting design, which is more stable during operation.

Fei Ying pb's heel is soft, so if you land with your heel at high speed, it's easy to step on it. 160x heel is thin, but it is comfortable within the cushioning limit, and the cushioning stroke is short, which helps to maintain a faster running rhythm. I can't judge which is better. For example, in the second half of Marseille, you may or prefer Fei Ying pb, a heel that can better share fatigue; However, runners with high stride frequency and small stride may prefer 160x heel. However, there is a contradiction here. If you are a runner and your weight is not very light, then you are likely to face the Fei Ying heel with extremely degraded performance in the second half of the whole horse, because the unidirectional performance of this material is not very good.

The front foot is the soul of the whole pb in Fei Ying, and this pair of shoes can be said to support his cost performance only by the front foot. Thicker midsole and high-hardness shovel-shaped carbon plate make the forefoot of this pair of shoes have longer one-way performance continuity, higher cushioning limit of the forefoot, and most importantly, Fei Ying pb has resilience and propulsion close to vaporfly next%%! (This also means higher achilles tendon pressure) At this point, the design of 160x is quite conservative, with only a little rolling feeling brought by upturned toes. As far as running economy is concerned, Fei Ying pb is undoubtedly better. On the other hand, due to the use of heterogeneous carbon plates with high hardness in Fei Ying, the flexibility is poor, and there are some problems such as uncomfortable cornering, strained calf muscles and poor ability to cope with complex road conditions. 160x carbon plate is soft, and the forefoot is separated from the left and right, so these problems do not exist.

Just like the next dispute between the tiger and vaporfly%%. Even if the tiger's upper is intimate, how strong the grip is and how durable it is; Even if the next %% vamp and stability are spit out. But the positioning of these two pairs of shoes in people's psychology is self-evident.

160x can be regarded as the ultimate improved version of the Tiger Step armed with various modern technologies. It keeps light weight, grasps the ground without sacrificing shock absorption and stability, and has a strong rebound because of the application of new materials, but there is no breakthrough in the general direction. Fei Ying pb is more like a miniature version of vaporfly next%%.

However, the gap between 160x and Fei Ying pb is far less obvious than that between Tiger Step and next%%, and there is still a lot of room for choice: 160x is relatively balanced and can score 80 points in all aspects; The advantages and disadvantages of lead in Fei Ying are obvious. There are only 60 points in many places, but you can get 90 points in the rebound and propulsion of the front foot. Unfortunately, this high score of 90 was not solved by myself, but out of a "complete tribute" to the leading works.

On the whole. The application scene of pb in Fei Ying is relatively narrow-it is suitable for lightweight runners with good foundation to use in long-distance road races or occasionally wear it in training. Personally, I hate wearing high-hardness non-isomeric carbon shoes in training. After a long time, the pressure on the inside of the calf and achilles tendon is great, especially on the inside of the calf, and even the obvious pain makes me have to extend my rest time. 160x has a wider range of application scenarios, and even if it is worn for a long time in training, the requirements for runners' ability are lower.