What would happen to the Warriors and Bulls without Curry and Ross? What would the sun be like today without Booker? So Booker is not despised, he is only an all-star level. Everyone thinks the warrior system is good, but in fact the warrior has no system at all. The league also has a system of the sun and the grizzly bear. Paul is absent, the Sun's winning percentage is still high, and the assists are far ahead. Booker is the same, which is why mvp doesn't have them. The suns are strong in the overall and role players. To some extent, Paul Booker is the biggest weakness of the Suns in the championship, because compared with the core of really strong teams, such as Wright, Durant and Curry. The gap between the two levels is obvious.
High-level data out of the top 20. Most of the high-level MVP data in the past 20 years are ranked first in two or three items, and the rest are also in the top five. MVPs with low high-order data include Shao Wei, Ross and Nash, but they are all very topical. Booker has no advantage, as long as he wins more, he is still a dual-core that keeps pace with each other. Like the Warriors' 67-win season, Curry Durant has no MVP.
14 season, Curry's competitor is only Harden, and Curry's real hit rate and high-level data are the first and second in the league. The record is even scarier than Harden's second victory in the West. There is no doubt that Harden was elected MVP with the first vote. Booker's influence on the team is far less than Curry's. There are many people with good data this year, but the scoring champion 14 only got 28 points. Besides, the most important point is, why not take 17 season as an example? That year, Curry averaged 26.4+6+5 and won 65 games. Didn't he make the top five MVP?
Last year, Jazz was the first in the league, and Mitchell's data was not bad. Why didn't anyone mention it? The mvp is not selected from the team with the first record in the league? If the mvp is selected from the team with the first record, then the mvp in 2008 should be Celtic, the mvp in 17 should be Curry, and the MVP in 2 1 year should be Mitchell's. This is just a preliminary impression. If you calculate carefully, at least 1/3 MVP will be re-elected.
There is no denying that Booker is promising to win the mvp in the future, but look at Paul 15 points and 8 assists, Pu 'er lost with 38 points, 9 rebounds and 7 assists, and Zhong Baoluo killed the audience with the last three points of 3 out of 3, with only 9 shots per game. Is this a blow? This is Paul's routine operation, so the data represents one thing, but it can't explain everything.
To put it bluntly, it is mainly because Paul has attracted some attention. With Paul here, he is not the only leader of the team. At the beginning, whether it was the screw and Curry's tactical position or the team position, there was no doubt about the existence of the team. Now the sun belongs to Paul, whether he knows it or not. ...
Paul thinks it is impossible to win if FMVP is caught. The best way to play is that Paul's score can't be higher than 18+ 10, and Booker's score can't be lower than 30+5+5. Now that Sun Aiton is leaving, I wonder if he can still play. If Aidan doesn't play the playoffs, the Suns won't even make it to the West. There will be a choice between Bucks or 76ers in this year's finals. The west will choose one from the warriors, grizzly bears and the sun. Sun and Bucks hope to win more championships!
Last year, Elton was the only one in the sun, and saric was injured. Kaminsky and Jay Smith didn't dare to use it directly, and they lost in the finals. This year, kaminsky and Jay Smith were replaced by McKee and Bi Yongbo, which completely filled the shortcomings and really have a good chance of winning the championship! But Paul doesn't want to finally make a plan to send the bucks to the championship, as he did last season.