KD2 front foot has zoom as a buffer, which is very light.

There is a protective belt on the forefoot, which can bring good wrapping to the foot surface.

And good protection.

The back palm is PHYLON, which can give you some vertical cushioning.

As for KD 1 mentioned by some friends in LS, it can be said that it is relatively inflexible. Although the technology is the same, KD2 is superior to KD 1 in performance.

As for the students' shoes on the third floor, they are called ZOOM SPEED LOW, and the package protection is not good.

As for the forefoot adiPRENE mentioned by LZ, it only appeared in Adidas Tianzu. It turns out that adiPRENE+ is more suitable for the forefoot, but I personally think that adiPRENE is not suitable for the striker inside, and the shock absorption is not as good as ZOOM. Of course, flexibility and start-up are guaranteed.

For KD2, LZ should rest assured that as the third shoe of the year, it definitely meets the requirements of LZ.

The original price is 689, and now most branches can receive it at around 300.

I am a professional sneaker collector and hope to help LZ. If you have any questions, please contact me.