Height and wingspan: O 'Neill's barefoot height is 2. 13, and his wingspan is 2.3 1, which is already against the sky. The standing touch height is about 2.87 meters, which is the data of wearing 1992 sneakers. We all say that there is no harm without comparison, and Chamberlain's data is even more terrible. Chamberlain's barefoot height is 2. 16, and his arm span is 2.34, which is 3cm longer than O 'Neill's. As for height, it will definitely be stronger. Chamberlain was originally 2.9 meters tall and wore 1956 canvas shoes. If he wears O 'Neill sneakers, it is estimated that he will be about 2cm taller.
Palm size: O 'Neill is a big hand monster in NBA, and mineral water in his hand has the visual sense of oral liquid. But Chamberlain is more exaggerated. He grabs the basketball with two fingers, and his hands are obviously bigger. O 'Neill's palm is about 27.9 cm wide. Results Chamberlain was 29.2 cm, which was the palm of A4 paper. Therefore, in the palm size, Chamberlain is still slightly better than O 'Neill.
Weight: It's important to play center. In the era of small ball, the monster weighing 240 kg was counted, while in the past, it was at least 260 kg. O 'Neill has an advantage. His career peak weight was 370 pounds, while Chamberlain's heaviest weight was 320 pounds. O 'Neill's peak figure is 335 pounds, and Chamberlain's is 3 10 pounds. It can be seen that O 'Neill's advantage in weight is also the key for him to dominate the inside and dunk.
Bouncing: Although the center is tall and heavy, the top center bounces well. O 'Neill's maximum touchdown height is about 3.7 meters, and he can jump about 90cm. But Chamberlain has tested the maximum height three times, 1956 is 3.8 1 m, 1960 is 3.96 m, 1968 is 3.89 m, and he can probably jump 1 m. It can be seen that Chamberlain has three periods. No wonder he's a little short of the upper edge of the rebound.
Speed: We've seen O 'Neal break through the dunk with the ball, and his speed is comparable to that of the defender. Because Chamberlain is too old, there are few pictures of his game. However, when Chamberlain was young, he was engaged in track and field sports, and his speed was naturally not slow. At the speed of 40 yards of 1966, Chamberlain can finish in 4.6 seconds, and O 'Neill's 40 yards is 5.6 seconds. The 30-year-old Chamberlain and James scored the same, both of which are the top running front data in the NFL.
It can be seen that in the physical talents PK of Chamberlain and O 'Neill, O 'Neill lost to Chamberlain in both static and dynamic data, except for weight, whether running or jumping, or the size of the palm. I thought their talents would be very close, but who would have thought there was such a big gap? There is only one NBA? Basketball emperor? He is Chamberlain. If Jordan didn't show up, he would be the first person in history!