On this issue, the standards of different provinces are different. Some provinces will adopt advanced accounting practice as the threshold condition for evaluation, while others will directly incorporate the examination results of advanced accounting practice into the evaluation process. For example, a province stipulates that the score should be directly taken from the part of the examinee's practice subject with a score of 50 or more, which will be appropriately adjusted according to the difficulty of the score in each year. Therefore, candidates must know the evaluation requirements of their provinces in advance, carefully prepare and prepare for the exam, and strive for excellent results. At the same time, the senior professional title examination has set up a gold list throughout the country, and all provinces have also set up a silver list to issue corresponding certificates. Candidates who have obtained relevant certificates will undoubtedly have an advantage in judging.
Myth 2: Compared with the "Advanced Accounting Practice" exam, the evaluation of senior accountants is more difficult, easy to test but not easy to evaluate.
In fact, senior accountants use a combination of examination and evaluation. "Advanced Accounting Practice" is a national unified examination subject, and the data evaluation is organized by the provincial financial department, which has strong autonomy in evaluation. In recent years, the public data show that the passing rate of advanced evaluation in many provinces is increasing year by year, and some provinces can even reach about 70%, which is much higher than the CPA exam and usually exceeds the' qualified rate' of advanced accounting practice exams in various provinces. Therefore, as long as the candidates take it seriously, they need not be too nervous.
Myth 3: I think that the nature and scale of the applicant's unit have a great influence on the evaluation results.
In fact, the evaluation of senior accountants focuses on the comprehensive consideration of the applicant's personal work performance, which has little to do with the nature and scale of the applicant's unit. Large huxing has its own characteristics, and small huxing also has its own unique advantages. Generally speaking, the systems and processes of large units are more standardized and the management is more refined; However, small-scale units have wider responsibilities and more people to contact. The key to successfully passing the review is the comprehensive performance during the review period.
Myth 4: people who think that they can be evaluated are basically people who have positions in the unit. Although the grass-roots financial personnel of the unit have undertaken many special projects, it is estimated that it is difficult to evaluate.
In fact, the management pays more attention to the macro issues within the unit, such as strategic management, budget management, risk management and personnel training. Naturally, it is easier to produce work results and has an advantage in reviewing materials. However, this does not mean that grassroots financial personnel have no possibility of passing. Senior title evaluation is a comprehensive evaluation of the materials submitted by the applicant. When the applicant has shortcomings in one aspect, he can make up for them in other aspects. For example, you can publish more professional papers and professional papers in journals with high gold content. Of course, all these need to be prepared. Practice has also proved that there are many grassroots financial personnel who have passed the audit.
Myth 5: I think preparing evaluation materials means preparing your own things according to the requirements of the evaluation documents of various provinces in that year, and there is no need to modify them.
In fact, on the one hand, applicants should keep in mind that the most basic score points are required in the audit documents. Applicants should prepare their performance materials item by item in strict accordance with the relevant requirements, so as to grasp the scoring points of the review. On the other hand, applicants should also tap the highlights of the application materials to show their personal performance advantages, refine and polish the performance materials repeatedly, properly process the application text, and break the stereotyped application style to make the judges shine.
Myth 6: I think that the audit materials are compiled by the applicant himself, and can be reported after the internal seal of the unit, so there is a lot of room for operation in the content, and even relevant materials can be fabricated at will.
Generally speaking, all provinces have set up strict reporting procedures for the evaluation of professional titles of high-level associations. The core part of the application materials needs to be publicized within the unit for not less than 7 working days. Every document submitted by the applicant needs strict item-by-item review by the unit, and the person in charge of the unit and the person in charge of the personnel department should sign and seal the application materials for confirmation. In fact, it is unlikely that materials will be manufactured jointly.
Knowing these misunderstandings, I believe everyone will be more confident, relax and stick to it when preparing the application and evaluation of 20 17 senior accountant. I wish you all success in obtaining the certificate of senior accounting title on 20 17.