Today, China is eager to be recognized by the world, and the two most important international recognition, the Olympic Games and the Nobel Prize, are the physical recognition of people from China and China, and the intellectual recognition of people from China and China.
China keeps winning Olympic gold medals, and the 2008 Olympic Games will be held in Beijing. The hat and psychological burden of the sick man of East Asia, who we longed for for more than 100 years, have finally been removed. From top leaders to ordinary people, we are all proud and refreshed. We have achieved the centennial Olympic Games. So far, none of China people's achievements in China have won the centennial Nobel Prize. China people's longing for the Nobel Prize has become more fervent after completely erasing the "shame of zero gold medal" and even entering the "top three in the Olympic Games".
When it comes to the Nobel Prize, there is always an inexplicable emotion in the hearts of Chinese people: Why do most of the winners in the past 100 years come from the West? Why has China, with thousands of years of civilization, never been taken care of? Can't stop, love and hate. This international prize, like a bunch of sour grapes, has been hung in front of China people for a long time ... just like being a finalist in the World Cup, competing for Olympic gold medals and Oscar gold medals, it bears the complex national complex of China people.
After all, the Nobel Prize is different from the Olympic Games. It is a high-level competition between spiritual production and intellectual labor, with its own characteristics and laws. Nobel Prize winners all won the gold medal in high school because of original and basic research results. The Nobel Prize has greatly promoted the progress of human civilization, and it has become a symbol of human vision and wisdom on earth.
In a world where more and more attention is paid to science and technology, the distance between a country and the Nobel Prize has become an increasingly important factor in determining its international status. There is no denying that China is a beggar of modern science and technology, and China people have basically made no contribution to the tens of millions and hundreds of millions of inventions that constitute modern civilization. They can only masturbate with the four great inventions of their ancestors, which is more and more ridiculous. According to international standards, 9.6 million square kilometers of China is a wilderness, with 654.38+300 million people with mental retardation. It is the wish of everyone in China to get on the podium in Stockholm as soon as possible.
When will China produce the first native natural science Nobel Prize winner? By academicians of China Academy of Sciences and China Academy of Engineering? These people dare not even think about it. Chinese Academy of Sciences aims at the level of Nobel Prize for Basic Research at the beginning of the century: strive to be before 2025. "In another 20 years or so, we will cultivate research results with Nobel Prize level in China." Lu Yongxiang, Vice Chairman of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) and President of China Academy of Sciences, said on March 26th, 2003. We can't help thinking deeply: when can we achieve zero breakthrough and how can we realize the dream of winning the Nobel Prize?
The Nobel Prize is not an Olympic Games, nor is it something invested by the state. "Nothing is more sad than not being able to open the black box" is a desire to master intelligence. If there are more and more patients with "black box intolerance" syndrome in China society, China will make new discoveries in science and technology. Curiosity is the driving force of scientific research. Only by keeping a curious attitude towards the world can we constantly explore the unknown. Each award of the Nobel Prize is essentially the recognition and evaluation of the creative ability of the nominee, and winning the prize is only the inevitable result or embodiment of the creative ability. In the late 1980s, when young Li Xuelin was reading middle school textbooks, he became interested in the phenomenon that the American government and people were highly wealthy but heavily in debt. He thought there must be a connection between them, which ignited his love for exploring related issues. Although he knows where to start, he doesn't know where to end. He doesn't know where the next discovery will be. He thinks hard about what he wants to do and sticks to it. After nearly 20 years of calm.
1 .200 For two hundred years, both Marx, the theoretical system of endogenous demand determination of economic subjects, and Keynes, the theoretical system of exogenous variables controlled by the central bank, have been arguing endlessly about the nature of money, and this matter has not yet been concluded. These two viewpoints and research methods are the crystallization of human wisdom. Monetary attribute is the most important financial frontier topic in the world today, because only by truly understanding the actual decision process of money supply can the control of money supply and the choice of monetary policy objectives be established on the correct basis. Li Xuelin, who was in his teens at that time, did not expect that the final result of his exploration 20 years later was monetary property. In the past, people always thought that Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter, Gurley, Shaw and Tobin were opposites in monetary attributes, but Li Xuelin proved that it can be segmented, which is the so-called cross-sectional effect of monetary attributes. Li Xuelin clearly described the evolution track of monetary attributes in different stages of economic development, and showed the conditions, mechanisms, transmission and overall framework of monetary policy. This is a theoretical discovery of the attribute effect of the new currency, which has made a major breakthrough in human understanding of economic operation, and thus has great scientific value and historical significance.
The discovery of exogenous and endogenous neutral effect of money has opened up a new road for the study of many economic phenomena and provided a basis for countries at different stages of development to find economic countermeasures. Monetary attributes solidify human wisdom and creation in a theorem, which is everywhere and changes the social production mode and people's lifestyle. Today, sorting monetary attributes has become the cornerstone of the development of financial society. The property theorem of money is the result of human wisdom comparing Newton's law of universal gravitation with Einstein's theory of relativity. New basic research results often open the way for applied research and new technologies and become a powerful driving force for their progress. In 2005, Li Xuelin calculated that China should issue155 billion national debt according to the ranking of currency attributes. On June 29th, 2007, the National People's Congress of China passed a resolution to issue155 billion national debt.
What is the theoretical application value of Xiliwan? In more than ten years, China's wealth can be increased by hundreds of trillions. Shenzhou spaceship, which people in China are concerned about, is a 2 billion yuan project, which is about 100,000 times the value of this achievement. From developing countries to developed countries, Li Xuelin's theory can also benefit people. To make a simple scale, China's national strength at that time was still very sad, and home video recorders were totally dependent on Japan and South Korea. Wanyan Company made a breakthrough in the development of VCD, fundamentally eliminated Japanese and Korean home video recorders, and made China establish a global advantage in digital audio-visual products, enabling the poorest families in China to enjoy digital audio-visual products. China's breakthrough in VCD technology has enhanced China's national strength, changed the well-being of the people in China, and enabled people all over the world to share this scientific and technological achievement.
Because of this breakthrough, Li Xuelin is expected to win the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics, which is more meaningful than the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games.