(Applicable to majors in arts and sciences)

Table 1: Qualification Examination Form for Graduation Thesis Defense for Undergraduate Students of Nanchang University in 2009

Table 2: Undergraduate Students of Nanchang University in 2009 Evaluation form of graduate thesis reviewers

Table 3: Nanchang University undergraduate thesis defense record form in 2009

Table 4: Nanchang University undergraduate thesis defense score sheet in 2009< /p>

Title:

Title source: □Provincial and ministerial level or above □City level □Horizontal □Optional

Nature of the topic: □Theoretical research □Application and theoretical research□ Practical Applied Research

College: Department:

Professional Class:

Student Name: Student Number:

Instructor: Professional Title:< /p>

2009-year system

Table 1: Nanchang University 2009 Undergraduate Thesis Defense Qualification Examination Form

Instructor Inspection

Student Graduation Thesis

Content task statement□ Yes□ No proposal report□ Yes□ No

Text□ Complete□ Unfinished word count

Chinese and English abstract□ Yes □ No

Translation of foreign language materials □ Yes □ No word count

Software and hardware acceptance □Complete □Not completed

Attendance status during the graduation thesis period. Any absenteeism and accumulated absenteeism?

Time and days

Instructor’s comments (indicate whether the defense can be conducted, and evaluate the students’ graduation thesis according to the quality of excellent, good, medium, passing, and failing and give the evaluation results Basis):

Instructor’s signature: Professional title: School (department):

Result year, month, day

Table 2: Undergraduate students of Nanchang University in 2009 Graduation thesis reviewer evaluation form

Reviewer’s name, professional title and academic qualifications in the school (department)

Evaluate the project as good, good, average, poor

Topic selection

Quality 01 Topic selection meets professional training objectives and reflects the basic requirements of comprehensive training

02 Difficulty of the topic

03 Topic workload

04 Theory Significance or practical value

Ability

Level 05 Ability to review literature and materials

06 Ability to comprehensively apply knowledge

07 Ability to design research plans

08 Ability to apply research methods and means

09 Ability to apply foreign languages

Achievements

Quality 10 The article title is consistent

11 Writing level

12 Writing standards

13 Length

14 Theoretical or practical value of the results

Originality of graduation thesis □ Yes □ Partial quotation □ Partial plagiarism □ Plagiarism

The reviewer’s evaluation (divided into five categories: excellent, good, medium, passing, and failed)

Review

Reviewer

Reviewer

Words

Reviewer’s signature: Year, month and day

Note: In principle, the reviewer should be a teacher other than the instructor with the title of associate professor or above. In special circumstances, with the approval of the graduation thesis leadership group of the school (department), the reviewer can be a teacher with the title of lecturer.

Table 3: Nanchang University 2009 Undergraduate Thesis Defense Record Form

1. Defense Expert Information

Defense Committee

（ Or defense team) Member serial number name professional title unit (A: on campus; B: off campus)

2. Defense record

Defense location Date of defense

Record content: 1. Explain the main points of the graduation thesis 2. Questions and answers

Recorder:

Note: If there is a lot of content to record, please add additional pages.

Table 4: Nanchang University 2009 Undergraduate Graduation Thesis Defense Rating Table

Instructor’s Rating:

Instructor’s Signature:

Year, Month, and Day

Reviewer’s Score:

Reviewer’s Signature:

Year, Month, and Day

Opinions of the Defense Committee:

Signatures of members: , , ,

Signature of the results director: Year, month, day

Evaluation opinions of the college (department):

Comprehensive results department ( Department) Signature of the leader in charge: Year, month, day

Grading criteria

Achievement criteria

Excellent, able to successfully complete the tasks specified in the mission statement, unique in some aspects insights and innovations; the argument is correct, the content is complete, and the writing is clear; the calculations and analysis are reliable and rigorous, and the conclusions are reasonable; the instructions and drawings are standardized and of high quality; the completed software and hardware meet or exceed the specified performance indicators and the documentation is complete and Standards or results have guiding significance for social development and economic construction; strong ability to work independently; clear concepts and correct answers to questions during the defense.

Be able to complete the tasks stipulated in the mission statement well; the argument is correct, the content is complete, and the writing is clear; the calculations and analysis demonstrations are basically correct, and the conclusions are reasonable; the instructions and drawings are in compliance with the specifications and are of high quality; the completed software, The hardware basically meets the specified performance indicators and the documentation is complete and standardized, or the results have certain guiding significance for social development and economic construction; have a certain ability to work independently; have clear concepts during the defense and be able to answer questions correctly.

Medium Ability to basically complete the tasks specified in the mission statement; the content is basically complete, there are no principled errors in calculations and demonstrations, and the conclusions are basically reasonable; the quality of the instructions and drawings is average; the completed software and hardware can still achieve the specified performance Indicators; the documents are basically complete and basically comply with the specifications; the working ability has been improved; the main questions raised during the defense can be answered, and they are basically correct.

The candidate can basically complete the tasks stipulated in the assignment letter; the quality of the paper is average, and there are individual errors; the instructions and drawings are not complete; the performance of the completed software and hardware is poor; the speech during the defense is not clear enough, and the answers to the questions are insufficient Inaccuracies or errors may exist.

Failure: Failure to complete the tasks stipulated in the assignment letter; the paper has principle errors; the instructions and drawings are of poor quality; there is plagiarism; the performance of the completed software and hardware is poor; the concept is unclear during the defense.

Note: The college (department) can also formulate its own scoring rules based on professional conditions.