Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Is gil-zero or c-bilups better?
Is gil-zero or c-bilups better?

Personally, I think the former is better. After all, it uses the latest technology of ADIDAS, GCS. GIL-ZERO `````The following are some reviews of GIL-ZERO that I copied ````Hope it can be of some help to you````````

GIL-ZERO Wizards Arenas' first signature sneaker

Its name is the same as the owner's number - "ZERO". A name that embodies Arenas' unyielding and ambition. Arenas is a good player who deserves respect

I believe his signature shoes will be as good as that

GIL-ZERO, which also carries top technology FORMOTION, is obviously much lower than the price of T-MAC 6

It is also outstanding In terms of practical value and affinity (this is very similar to Arenas), among the BIG 5 team, GIL-ZERO is obviously aimed at the mid-range market

But to be honest, GIL-ZERO is better than T-MAC 6 is more suitable for survival on the court

So I defined it as a practical sneaker

Ⅰ. Style: The first time I saw GIL-ZERO, it felt like Very strange like Arenas

Even a little weird

Breathable holes all over the shoe body

On the outside, there are three stripes transformed from the large sole pattern

The uppers are shockingly low...(actually the one I saw was the LOW version at the time...) After I got the real thing

I got used to it after seeing it too much

In fact, this pair The shoes are not as special as I saw at first glance

And MID obviously gives me a much greater sense of security than LOW... The whole pair of shoes uses patent leather design in three places (snake pattern? OK) It seems to be a patent leather pattern specially designed for FORMOTION. This is also the case on T-MAC6). They are the toe box

The area where the LOGO on the shoe tail and side bevel is located

The benefits of proper layout

p>

In addition

The whole pair of shoes does not have many explanation points about its identity

For this color scheme, only the arch of the foot is printed with Arenas’ exclusive LOGO. Finally, I discovered

In fact, what I am least accustomed to is the countless ventilation holes...

Style: ★★★☆(Full score is 5★

☆ is Half a point

The same below)

II. Wrapping: I don’t know if the shoes using FORMOTION all have some of the same characteristics

For example, it is difficult to Tighten the shoelaces and the like...GIL-ZERO's wrapping is not very strong

The area mainly responsible for fixing the foot is the instep where the shoelaces are located

Tighten it layer by layer "Tighten" the shoelaces

After paying the price of half a layer of skin on your fingers

You will not feel restrained

The instep will not be strangled. It hurts

But for me personally, the wrapping around the mid-section of the side of the foot is not enough

I personally prefer the feeling of VC 5 or AIR MAX 180BB (that is, AF) However, it is still possible to fix the legs

so that they do not move randomly

So the wrapping properties are basically qualified (my pursuit of wrapping properties is even demanding

For Friends who like to play with loose shoelaces don’t need to pay too much attention to my description of the wrapping) There is another point

Thanks to the unique heel design

it can be easily Stuffing your feet into the shoes

It is much more comfortable than wearing T-MAC6

Of course

This design is not just for wearing shoes

More details below

Oh

Suddenly I remembered a unique feature of Adidas - the insoles are as slippery as loach wraps: ★★★★

Ⅲ. Grip: GIL-ZERO's outsole is divided into four areas

It is mixed with three different large bottom patterns---circular water ripples

It combines the herringbone pattern of the adidas LOGO and the vertical herringbone pattern

When I first saw this outsole, I thought of KIDD’s big eyes (it seems that adidas has been learning from Nike recently

From retro to replica to sole grooves and even large soles) Adidas marked the non-marking words on the outsole. GIL-ZERO’s soles are the same as T-MAC 6

Also very soft

Note

Just saying they are all soft

But their textures are obviously different. T-MAC 6 feels more like hard rubber

p>

GIL-ZERO feels like hard foam (more on durability below), but in actual combat, the grip of GIL-ZERO is not as good as I imagined

I can only say It's pretty average

I slipped twice on the concrete floor

The performance on the rubber pellet court is quite satisfactory

It won't make you slip but it won't make you stop if you want to. It’s not easy

I think it may be related to the cleanliness of the ground

Because now if you look at the soles, you can see a thick layer of dust

So everyone is It's best to pay attention when wearing it

To avoid capsizing in the gutter

Grip (infield): ★★★★

Grip (outfield): ★★★☆

IV. Reactivity: A big reason why I define GIL-ZERO as a practical sneaker is that it pursues high-tech luxury compared to T-MAC 6

It is more inclined to practical value

This can be seen from the adiPRENE that has not been abandoned

I have always thought that this classic adidas technology is not young

But it still has its meaning

At least it gives me a stronger sense of feedback than FORMOTION (some friends say that FORMOTION has a lateral assist feeling

I personally think that It's because through FORMOTION technology

When breaking through quickly sideways

the contact area between the shoe and the ground is greatly increased than before

so the force transmission is smoother. and effective

Compared to the past

It feels like a qualitative leap

So this assistance is more likely to be the wearer's own strength that he has never felt before

Rather than the feedback of FORMOTION

I hope experts can correct me) It may be due to the weight of the shoe body

Personally, I feel that the responsiveness of GIL-ZERO is indeed better than that of T-MAC 6 is better

Here are two small designs that have to be mentioned

One is the deeply sunken heel design

This is something I personally like very much. A detail I like

Not just for the convenience of wearing shoes

When you run or walk

Your ankle will not have any constraints in the forward and backward movements

It can be said that this design enhances the flexibility of the shoes to a certain extent

Although it is based on sacrificing protection

Relatively Compared with LOW, I personally think that the feeling of the two when moving the ankle back and forth will not be much different

The second is the round back root

Because Arenas is running It feels like it lands on the ground

So GIL-ZERO is specially designed like this

As long as you compare it with Tianzu basketball shoes, you will find that the back heel design of the two is very different. Similar

The fusion of these two points

means that your steps can be larger when you stride

and the speed will be faster

Another *** similarity about FORMOTION

There will be a helper between the mid-palm and fore-foot units.

The small curved grooves in the sole

Responsiveness: ★★★★

In short, I personally think that GIL-ZERO is a very good pair of defender shoes. They are also very wear-resistant and because this is Arenas’ first signature shoe, they are of great significance and are extremely cost-effective, so I recommend you buy them. ``````````