Legal analysis: the situation that the resolution of the shareholders' meeting is invalid refers to the illegality of its content, and its formal defects have no absolute effect on the bona fide third party, and they are still valid without being revoked; The resolution of the shareholders' meeting is only a legal procedural document for the cancellation of the company, and the review of relevant documents by the industrial and commercial authorities is limited to formal review. In the absence of evidence to prove that there is a major fault in the formal examination of the industrial and commercial authorities, shareholders request re-liquidation on the grounds that the signature of the resolution of the shareholders' meeting is forged, and the court does not support it.

Legal basis: Article 22 of the Company Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) is invalid if the resolution of the shareholders' meeting or the shareholders' general meeting or the board of directors violates laws and administrative regulations. If the convening procedure and voting method of the shareholders' meeting, shareholders' general meeting or the board of directors violate laws, administrative regulations or the articles of association, or the contents of the resolution violate the articles of association, the shareholders may request the people's court to cancel it within 60 days from the date of making the resolution. Where a shareholder brings a lawsuit in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the people's court may, at the request of the company, require the shareholder to provide corresponding guarantees. If the company has gone through the registration of change according to the resolution of the shareholders' meeting or the shareholders' meeting or the board of directors, after the people's court declares the resolution invalid or cancels the resolution, the company shall apply to the company registration authority for cancellation of the registration of change.