After trial, Beijing No.3 Intermediate People's Court held that the facts of the two cases were clear and the applicable law was correct, and the appellant Ma Rong's appeal grounds could not be established, so both cases decided to reject the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
Prior review
On February 2018 12, Ma Rong publicly expressed his disagreement with the first-instance judgment in Weibo and said that he would appeal.
Since then, Ma Rong has repeatedly issued Weibo's voice on issues related to divorce cases.
The main reason for Wang's application for the publicity of the second trial is that Ma Rong has repeatedly released information related to this case in public places such as the media during the trial of the case and after the civil judgments of the first trial of the two cases were made, and the evidence of the two cases is basically the same, which has been basically known to the public through media reports, and there is no case of not conducting a public trial because of personal privacy.
On the afternoon of June 18, Beijing No.3 Intermediate People's Court held a pre-trial meeting on the two cases. On the evening of June 15 1 p.m., Ma Rong Weibo posted a photo, implying that he would attend the pre-trial meeting in person. After the court, she issued two handwritten "Applications for Public Trial", saying that "let the whole case get a sunny trial!"
According to relevant media reports, Ma Rong did not agree to divorce during the appeal, and both parties submitted new evidence. The pre-trial meeting lasted for seven hours until the evening.