From the perspective of long-term and cultivating children's healthy personality, the placement system is extremely harmful. I believe those adults in education are fully aware of it. Why are you doing this? Some people attribute it to the college entrance examination system and examination system. In my opinion, the key lies in the wrong teaching evaluation criteria. Evaluating the teaching quality by the enrollment rate is the foundation of the placement system. As long as the score is the only criterion to measure the quality of teaching, it is inevitable to divide classes.
However, it is unrealistic to ask to give up the fractional theory completely. It's too early to start from elementary school and junior high school. Inevitably, we can compromise: it should be acceptable to divide junior and senior high school graduates into key classes and non-key classes.
Is the key class discriminatory or teaching students in accordance with their aptitude? Some people say that early competition adapts to development, while others think that great pressure increases the burden. The teaching purpose of dividing key classes into non-key classes is undoubtedly good. But as far as this teaching mode and teaching means are concerned, objectively speaking, it is indeed mixed with "discrimination".
Junior high school students do not have the ability to adjust their mentality with the change of environment, and even if they do, they are immature. Before the placement, I used to be an elite in my class and a leader. After the placement, the talents are refined, the courses are deepened and the competition is fierce. The "sense of honor" and the motivation to motivate yourself to study hard suddenly turned into invisible pressure. It is difficult for them to adapt to the changes in the environment, so that junior high school students who are not physically and mentally developed can try to experience the competitive atmosphere of adult society prematurely. This is somewhat inappropriate, which may easily lead to "counterproductive" consequences, which will inevitably lead to a decline in children's interest in learning, a lack of confidence in themselves, or a mental illness caused by the psychological pressure of "not advancing or falling back", which is unfavorable or hindering children's healthy growth, which is inconsistent with the teaching purpose. It is quite different from the slogan of advocating quality education. Will students in non-key classes have negative, inferiority complex and even gloomy psychology of wrestling? Anyway, I'm not a student in a key class, so it doesn't matter whether I study or not. Under such psychological guidance, it will inevitably affect the teacher's classroom teaching order, and will inevitably breed teachers to adopt a perfunctory teaching attitude towards students in their non-key classes? Does it refute the teaching purpose of "teaching students in accordance with their aptitude"?
Children's intelligence, personality and teaching methods of junior high school teachers are closely related to their grades. The quality of children's junior high school grades will not have much impact on their future studies. After all, with the growth of age, the broadening of horizons will have a correct and mature understanding of the importance of knowledge.
Under the new situation of advocating quality education, students' achievements and comprehensive quality at this stage of education will definitely have a causal relationship with teachers' teaching methods. Balanced study, exchange needed goods, help each other and make progress together.
The new compulsory education law stops "key classes" in order to advocate balanced education. However, how to realize the organic unity of balanced education concept and the law of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude in teaching? Balanced education should be based on respecting students' differences and allowing students to enjoy the same educational resources. At present, the "experimental class" and "super-long class" in schools are set up precisely to respect students' personality and highlight teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. Their aim is to enable children from different starting points to receive their own education. Because the enrollment rate is always an important benchmark to measure a school, it is undoubtedly an important way to focus on outstanding students and the best teachers to "attack" and improve the enrollment rate and the "popularity" of the school. "Don't divide into classes can't generalize. Stopping fast classes and slow classes have different effects on students at different levels. It should be said that it is most advantageous for middle school students not to be divided into classes, which is more likely to be positively influenced by outstanding students. For top students, not being divided into classes creates a relatively comfortable and stable small environment. Because of the lack of competitors, they tend to be complacent and may be lazy. However, due to the less competitive pressure, top students will have more time to do what they like, and their quality will be more comprehensively developed. However, for poor students, not being divided into classes may lead to a situation where teaching orientation cannot be taken into account, and on the other hand, it will inevitably lose confidence because of disparity. "
How does it feel to be divided into "key classes" and "non-key classes"? Students have the most say. Although the placement of classes makes some "top students" feel like a duck to water, more students feel that they are under too much pressure, including the burden of "creating excellence" in schools and the ardent hopes of parents. Students in non-key classes always think that they can't do it, and their self-esteem will be hurt to a certain extent, and even they will feel discriminated against and have a negative psychology of giving up on themselves. "Placement is an educational discrimination and should be stopped." Although I am now in a key class, the learning atmosphere in the class is very good, but the air is always very depressed, and the students become indifferent because of fierce competition, and there is always an invisible mental pressure hanging over them. ""fast class classroom discipline is also very good, no one make trouble. Fortunately, through my own efforts, I was assigned to the' experimental class' this semester. "
Parents said frankly: for the cancellation of "key classes". "Compulsory education had better not be divided into fast classes and slow classes. Since it is a place to educate people, we must treat them equally. Labeling students with unequal grades will inevitably stifle the enthusiasm of' poor students'. In this unequal educational environment, the advantages of other aspects will gradually disappear unconsciously. " Some parents suggest that dividing classes can create a better learning environment.
In reality, we have to think deeply about the deeper reasons for this phenomenon.
Examination-oriented education is fundamental.
Educators point out that "fast class and slow class" is actually only the appearance of the problem, and its real root lies in the current exam-oriented education system. On the one hand, fast classes and slow classes are caused by the long-term imbalance of educational resources. In order to change this situation, it is not enough to abolish key classes only by legislation. The most fundamental thing is to achieve educational equality through legislation. This equality includes the equality of education funds and teachers, as well as the concept of equality that students, parents and schools should establish. On the other hand, in the current situation that school education is centered on the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination, it is an inevitable product of the system of pursuing the rate of enrollment. Only by realizing the equality and balance of education and changing the one-sided education evaluation mechanism can the new law be truly implemented and the compulsory education system be truly and effectively implemented.
Key classes are the product of the times, with advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, concentrating superior educational resources is easy to produce results; On the other hand, the division of key classes makes the voice of fair educational resources harsh.
Benefits of "key classes":
1. For students, teaching is based on "class" to prevent some top students from "not having enough to eat"
Key classes, also called fast and slow classes, refer to the placement of students according to their test scores. Divide some excellent students into key classes with excellent teachers and pay attention to them so as to teach them according to their classes. Objectively speaking, students experience stronger competitive atmosphere and higher learning enthusiasm, which is more conducive to teachers' organization of teaching.
Strictly speaking, the theory of "fast and slow classes" can't summarize this kind of placement system. Because the current placement education and teaching progress is the same. Every time I take the city-wide unified examination, my learning progress is the same. The reason why fast classes are fast is more reflected in the difficulty of teaching. Teaching students in crash courses can make their knowledge deeper and wider.
2. For schools, it is conducive to concentrating superior educational resources and grasping the enrollment rate.
The enrollment rate is an important part of the brand image of a school. For schools with general teaching conditions, it is a desirable method to skillfully allocate limited excellent teachers to achieve the best continuing education effect under the existing conditions. In recent years, the practice of dividing key classes into non-key classes has also penetrated into key middle schools. This has something to do with the increase of unplanned students in high school and the slow follow-up of teachers. The competition between key middle schools has evolved from the competition of enrollment rate to the competition of online rate of key undergraduate courses, and the teaching method of divided classes is equally feasible.
3. For teachers, it is easy to produce educational achievements.
Because students have higher comprehensive quality and stronger learning motivation, teachers feel more relaxed in the teaching process and try some new teaching methods more boldly. For schools, it is easy to become famous students and famous teachers, and for teachers, it is easier to make breakthroughs in job title evaluation and salary evaluation.
Disadvantages of key classes:
1, the school reflects the unfair distribution of educational resources.
The division of "key classes" makes students in the same school enjoy completely different educational resources and learning environment, depriving a considerable number of students of equal education rights, which is extremely inconsistent with the principles of educational fairness and public welfare.
2. The inferiority complex of students in non-key classes can be easily strengthened.
The learning atmosphere of non-key classes is relatively weak, which is not conducive to teachers' organizing education and forming students' healthy learning psychology. Some students are inevitably reported to have broken cans and broken falls.
3. Teachers in non-key classes lack a sense of accomplishment.
The achievements of teachers in key classes are based on the silent efforts of teachers in non-key classes. Teachers in non-key classes are acting as green leaves for the overall situation of the whole school and the cultivation of talents in the motherland. Most children affected by social problems and family problems come from non-key classes that are not paid much attention to, and accordingly, such teachers are under greater social pressure. However, for teachers in non-key classes, because it is difficult to produce teaching results, the selection work is advanced, and the chances of evaluating teachers' titles are relatively small.
The rise and fall of "key classes" has attracted the attention of educators, teachers and parents. We can regard it as a response to social competition on campus.