Because farmers' job is to cultivate land, and they need to adapt to the weather when they cultivate land, and the inaction advocated by Laozi has a meaning of encouraging people to do it, but don't care, don't compete, that is, don't be too subjective. This is a good attitude of farmers to grow crops.

Lao tze's? Doing nothing? And then what? Do not dispute? It is not a simple understanding, not a simple concession and cowardice that people think, but a heartfelt feeling. The focus of the struggle lies in people's subjective consciousness, that is, people's subjective wishes, and the focus lies in external factors that conform to objective laws. Therefore, from the perspective of Laozi, we can see clearly why it has become a classic admired by farmers.

When planting crops, farmers should adapt to the weather and not look at the growth of this crop according to their subjective consciousness. As we know, when he was actually planting crops, the farmer didn't conform to the natural law of crop growth and wanted it to grow as soon as possible according to his subjective consciousness, so he pulled this thing, but it was actually impossible. This view of Laozi just shows that we should follow the laws of nature and not develop anything because of subjective consciousness.

Therefore, Lao Tzu's inaction is indisputable. He didn't really mean what we thought. We can also use this idea in our daily life, that is, as long as we work hard, the result will naturally be like this. The same is true for farmers to farm. As long as they work hard, the harvest of crops is given to nature, and they don't want to manipulate the results. I think this should be the reason why farmers regard Laozi's inaction as a classic.