Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - What does the new four histories mean?
What does the new four histories mean?
New Four History: Party History, New China History, Reform and Opening-up History and Socialist Development History.

Only by persisting in building the Party with thought and strengthening the Party with theory can Do not forget your initiative mind take on its mission more consciously and firmly. "We should take studying and implementing the Party's innovation theory as the top priority of ideological armed forces, and combine it with studying the history of the Party, the history of New China, the history of reform and opening up, and the history of socialist development.

The contents of the "Four History" have their own emphases, but the whole story is the practical history of China's pursuit of happiness for the people, rejuvenation for the nation and great harmony for the world, and the leadership of China is the main thread of the "Four History".

Methods of learning four histories:

The core essence is historical facts, historical views and historical lessons. Historical facts, that is, to find out the objective past; Historical view, that is, understanding, explanation and evaluation of the past; Taking history as a mirror means taking history as a mirror, serving the reality and enlightening the future. These three elements are interrelated. Historical facts are the cornerstone of understanding, explaining and understanding history. We say that "there is nothing in words, and there is evidence in history", which means that history learning should proceed from facts.

Historical facts depend on historical materials, but historical materials are not equal to historical facts. Only by removing the rough and selecting the fine, discarding the false and retaining the true, can historical information approach "nature" step by step.

Of course, the "essence" of history is not equal to history. For a historical phenomenon, person or event, people will make different or even diametrically opposite understandings and evaluations because of their different cognitive abilities and positions on the complex causal relationship formed by historical facts. This cognitive difference will affect or influence the absorption of historical experience and lessons, as well as the analysis and solution of practical problems.

It can be seen that the study of the "Four History" should first be based on accurate historical facts, which are the flesh and blood of the historical view, which stems from the respect and induction of historical facts, and historical lessons also depend on the value and logical guidance of the historical view. If there is no scientific view of history as a guide, that is, from the standpoint of the party and the people, comprehensively and objectively grasp historical materials and dialectically understand historical facts, it is impossible to have a realistic scientific understanding and understanding of the "four histories."