1. First of all, learning to be a human being is a prerequisite for learning. What should we clarify the purpose of learning? At a small level, it is to hone oneself, and at a large level, it is to benefit society. But please ask the opposing debater to pay attention to the premise of learning. Our learning premise cannot go astray. A big bad guy who is knowledgeable about the past and the present is much more terrifying than a little thief who is ignorant and has no skills. From a general point of view, before learning, one must first learn to be a human being.

2. Second, learning to be a human being is the guarantee of the learning process. Learning to be a good person is not only about noble morals, but also means a good interpersonal environment. This is an important guarantee for our study in school and even our study after entering society. Without it, learning will inevitably be half the result with half the effort.

3. Third, learning to be a human being is an important reflection of learning results. Knowledge can shape personality, but definitely not all knowledge can shape good personality. The quality of learning results is often inseparable from personality. For example: Yue Fei, a famous general in the Northern Song Dynasty, and Qin Hui, a traitorous minister, who had higher literary attainments? If you ask ten people, probably nine and a half will say: Yue Fei! Without him, the song "The River is Red" will last forever. But what is the actual situation? The historical fact is that Qin Hui was probably much better than Yue Fei. Just because of Qin Hui's dirty personality, his academic achievements were wiped out.

Can’t such a lesson awaken the other party’s debate friends?