People's Daily signed article: Dare to fight and win dignity.
People's Daily article: Open cooperation and common development are the right way-only by safeguarding international morality can the world prosper together.
Xinhua News Agency commentator's article: Open the future with the key of innovation-strengthen the confidence to win and meet the risk challenge.
Global Times editorial article: Pompeo has become a source of chaos on the international stage.
These four articles also answered four current questions:
Do you want to play hard?
What is the right path to world prosperity?
What is the solid support for us to meet the risk challenge?
Why did you crusade against Pompeo?
The answer is here:
For some time, the US government has frequently provoked economic and trade frictions and put pressure on China in all directions. However, some people in the public opinion field made "unusual" noises, saying that the US crackdown was caused by China's "high profile" and it was time to "bear with it" instead of "compromise for perfection".
Is it really a "brilliant idea"? Can tolerance really seek safety, and compromise really seek perfection?
History has repeatedly warned us that the logic of hegemonism has never changed, nor has its bullying nature changed. In the face of "the law of the jungle", one step back can only lead to one inch, and one step back will only lead to higher prices.
Looking back at history, we have won new victories, created a new situation and won the respect of the world, including our opponents, in the course of being brave and good at fighting again and again. In the great struggle with many new historical characteristics, we must win national dignity and create development space by carrying forward the spirit of struggle.
Therefore, the answer to the first question is-dare to struggle to win dignity.
The second question is, what is the right path for the common prosperity of the world?
Creating conditions for free trade can promote global development. And some people in America have lost their basic cognitive ability for their own benefit. In the face of their own development problems, they shift the responsibility to others, regard other countries as threats, wave tariff sticks at will, exert extreme pressure, and "decouple" at every turn, which damages the process of economic globalization and exposes that their deep-rooted zero-sum thinking is out of date.
Combine righteousness with profit, and put righteousness first. The international development cooperation advocated by China is full of moral strength and shows great appeal and attraction. China proposed the Belt and Road Initiative, and1more than 60 countries and international organizations signed cooperation documents with China; China proposed to establish an Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank with members from all over the world. In April this year, the second "Belt and Road" international cooperation summit forum was attended by more than 6,000 foreign guests from 150 countries and 92 international organizations, and 283 achievements were achieved. According to a report recently published by the World Bank, the full implementation of the "Belt and Road Initiative" can help 32 million people get rid of moderate poverty with an average daily living cost of less than $3.2, which will increase global trade by 6.2%, trade among economies along the route by 9.7% and global income by 2.9%.
Therefore, to meet the global development challenges, international cooperation is the general trend. Adhere to openness, cooperation and win-win, and make friends with global development partners from the moral high ground, and China's development road will be wider and smoother. Anyone who tries to curb the development of China is doomed to be in vain.
What is the solid support for us to meet the risk challenge?
A: Open the future with the key of innovation.
Recently, the innovation in China's science and technology field has been sending exciting good news: the prototype of the 600-kilometer-per-hour high-speed maglev test rolled off the assembly line, and the first solid launch vehicle technology test was successful. China ranked first in the list of the world's top 500 supercomputers for the fourth time with 2 19 supercomputers, and 17 China institutions were among the "20 19 natural index years" published by Nature magazine.
Innovation is the first driving force to lead development, and it is also a solid support for us to cope with risk challenges. For some time, some people in the United States have concocted false arguments such as "compulsory technology transfer", "stealing intellectual property rights" and "China's technology is harmful", abused the name of national security to suppress China enterprises, politicized scientific and technological issues, and attempted to curb the high-tech development of China and limit China to the middle and low end of the international industrial chain. These bullying behaviors in the field of science and technology do not conform to the trend of the times and violate the scientific spirit, and are generally opposed by academia and industry.
The winner is strong, and the self-improvement wins. Practice has repeatedly told us that the key core technology will not come, can not be bought, and innovation still depends on ourselves. In the face of increasingly fierce international scientific and technological competition and various risk challenges, what is most needed is a scientific and rational attitude and resolute action. Make up your mind, unswervingly follow the road of independent innovation, solve the pain of "lack of core and soul", consolidate the foundation of innovation and development, and firmly grasp the key core technologies in your own hands, so as to remain invincible and firmly grasp the initiative of economic and social development.
Ok, the fourth question: Pompeo!
The title of this commentary in Global Times is straightforward: Pompeo has become a source of chaos on the international stage.
Why? Let's look at his performance:
At the historical juncture when American national strategy turned to the cold war mentality, he pushed this turn to extremes again and again with his personal strength and became the "eagle in the eagle" of American foreign policy;
In recent days, I took the opportunity of frequent visits to China, Russian, Iranian and other countries to make a bow and do my best to slander and suppress. Only in the direction of China, his offensive language completely broke through the previous American diplomatic language system with China and used all kinds of vicious words;
He was the most active lobbyist and bully who incited allies to ban Huawei, especially spared no effort in attacking China's Xinjiang policy, and even crossed the Rubicon River on issues such as Hongkong.
……
There are many military and intelligence factors in Pompeo's experience. When he was openly a member of parliament, he launched a foreign conflict. Confrontation seems to be his mentality and the only thing he can do.
American national strategy regards China as a "strategic competitor", while Pompeo is exchanging "strategic competition" for "strategic hostility". This is by no means what the American public, who also want to live in peace, wants. In order to make the hostile claims against China seem reasonable, Pompeo incited American public opinion to hate China, and he labeled China one vicious label after another.
The article concludes by saying:
The emergence of such a secretary of state cannot but be said to be a tragedy of American politics and a sorrow of international politics. The world needs to be alert to Pompeo's moth-eaten erosion of human peace, and don't be polite to him for creating destructive power just because he won the honor of the US Secretary of State. In particular, it has dealt a blow to the constructive role of the diplomatic community, squeezed away the precious space for easing conflicts between countries, and smeared a heavy stain on the professional glory of diplomacy. The global diplomatic community should despise his behavior and * * * punish them.