Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Summary of examination paper inspection work
Summary of examination paper inspection work

A summary is a written material that evaluates and describes the achievements, existing problems, experiences and lessons learned, etc. It can clarify the direction of the next step of work, avoid detours, and avoid mistakes. Make mistakes and improve work efficiency, so we must make a good summary and write a good summary. So what should we pay attention to in the summary? The following is a summary of the test paper inspection work that I collected for everyone. You are welcome to share it. Summary of test paper inspection work 1

1. Existing problems:

1. Some teachers did not prepare lessons as required, and the teaching strategies were not implemented in place.

2. Some teachers only have a brief analysis of the teaching materials for the entire lesson preparation, and the objectives are not accurately determined. The key and difficult teaching points and class arrangements of the textbook are not clearly written, and the role of the teaching material for the entire lesson preparation is lost.

3. Post-teaching reflections are sporadic and the writing is not timely. During this inspection, some teachers did not have enough awareness of post-teaching reflection, did not understand deeply, and even seemed to be coping with the inspection, which was not conducive to the professional growth of teachers at all. Most teachers' teaching reflections are formalized and not highly targeted, which will not be of much help to future teaching. It cannot play the role of reflection, adjustment, and improvement very well; in fact, we do not necessarily require teachers to reflect in every lesson, but the thinking must involve the essence, which can be clearly reflected in several points.

4. In the lesson preparation of individual teachers, the design of the teaching process is simple and empty, lacking practicality; even simple cases must reflect the main teaching process, and must have breakthroughs in key and difficult points and the application of teachers’ teaching methods. and guidance for students in law study. For practice classes, the requirement is not only to write down in which exercises the questions should be done in the lesson preparation, but also to prepare for the difficulties that students will encounter when doing these questions? Or what is the use of practicing this question for students? How do you guide students to solve this problem, etc. It cannot be too simple.

5. Lesson preparation could not keep up with the progress. More than half of the semester was spent, and only 7 lessons were prepared; some teachers used the old lesson preparation, and the time for last year's "lesson preparation team reviewed" was changed from 2 months to 3 hours. month.

2. Homework situation

During the inspection, it was found that most teachers’ homework is in sync with the teaching progress. The homework content is set more scientifically, and they can be corrected in a timely and conscientious manner. The corrections are dated and implemented. Ratings and a few motivational comments. There are correction records. Students can correct according to the teacher's requirements, and most teachers have signs of making second corrections. Among them, teachers Liu Enyuan, Li Chaoyan, Liu Xixia and other teachers’ homework corrections are graded through a combination of three levels of evaluation: self-marking, group marking, and teacher marking. The correction records of teachers such as Du Yiling, Cao Xuemei, Du Yan, Li Jinfeng, etc. are effective.

At the same time, some problems were also discovered:

1. The format of students’ homework is not standardized. For example: each homework assignment did not clearly indicate the number of exercises and homework time; the middle line was not drawn on the large homework book.

2. The amount of homework is too small. Some teachers do four homeworks on one page. The setting content of the job is single and cannot reflect the hierarchical job.

3. Students in most classes have no habit of correcting mistakes.

4. The teacher was not careful and meticulous enough in correcting, and the students’ wrong questions were not corrected. Correction symbols are not standardized, and “×” still appears on students’ homework books and test papers.

5. Many teachers do not have correction records, or are out of sync with homework, are not effective, and show signs of being unable to cope with inspections.

3. Examination paper marking and commenting:

Most teachers monitor the progress of the unit and the teaching progress in synchronization, and make complete corrections to ensure timely commenting and summary. Among them, teachers such as Liu Ying, Sun Hong'e, Wang Shengjun, He Chungui, Gao Yingtang, Li Jinfeng, Dai Zunlian, Liu Xixia and other teachers gave serious and practical explanations and evaluations. Problems that arise:

1. The marking of test papers is not timely, the comments and comments cannot keep up, and the comments and comments made by individual teachers are empty and ineffective. There is a phenomenon of students marking; the marking is not serious, there is no mark on the entire paper, only a check mark under the grade.

2. Students have poor habits of correcting mistakes.

3. The correction symbols are not standardized. No grade evaluation is used;

4. Parents’ signatures are rare, let alone parents’ suggestions.

IV. Suggestions and thoughts:

1. Leaders of each joint primary school should set up a regular teaching inspection team to conduct inspections every half month to form process materials and institutionalize regular inspections.

2. We hope that teachers will prepare lessons every week and prepare lessons based on studying the curriculum standards, researching teaching materials, grasping new teaching concepts, and understanding students. If they do not prepare lessons, they will not attend classes and reduce the number of classes. of arbitrariness.

3. We don’t want the phenomenon of copying lesson plans to happen again. Study the teaching materials carefully and constantly change your teaching concepts. When preparing lessons, you must not only prepare teaching materials, but also prepare the learning situation of the students in the class. When borrowing from others, you must connect it with your own actual situation and carefully choose from it, rather than just copying it. There is not even a projector, and a large screen appears in the lesson plan... We must "enlighten" the excellent lesson plans compiled by experts, prohibit borrowing them, choose those that suit the actual situation of our students, and internalize them for ourselves thinking, and compiled into effective teaching plans to lay the foundation for building an efficient classroom.

4. Teachers are expected to write their teaching reflections carefully. Post-class reflection must have both a certain quantity and a certain quality. After each class, you must carefully summarize and reflect in order to improve your own teaching and accumulate wealth for your better teaching in the future. We don’t want teachers to “reflect” just for school inspections, but to truly think and explore problems in teaching from the perspective of their own professional growth. We hope that teachers can have independent thinking and creative opinions on teaching phenomena and teaching issues, so that they can truly become the masters of teaching and teaching research. The combination of teaching and reflection can also help teachers gain rational sublimation and rationality in their labor. Emotional pleasure can improve one's spiritual realm and thinking taste, which can change teachers' own lifestyle and enable teachers to realize the value and significance of their own existence.

5. It is recommended that teachers carefully study the "Interim Provisions on Lesson Preparation Reform of Tongjing Primary School" and the standardized requirements for homework and lesson preparation in each subject. Standardize your teaching behavior according to requirements.

6. Regarding hierarchical homework: It is recommended that when teachers design and assign mathematics homework, they should arrange hierarchical homework according to the specific differences of students, and have different requirements and standards for students at different levels. . Truly implement the concept of "everyone learns valuable mathematics; everyone can obtain necessary mathematics; different people develop differently in mathematics". For details, please refer to the following operating methods: After dividing students into basic groups and advanced groups, the homework is divided into two levels of questions according to the learning objectives, namely mandatory questions and optional questions. Required questions (some questions that require every student to master basic knowledge) are required to be done by the whole class; optional questions (which require students to master the knowledge before they can answer it correctly), and then start to let students at different levels Students complete assignments at different levels. In this way, students at all levels can sort out and improve their own ideas, develop and expand their thinking during the homework process. It not only ensures "facing the whole", but also takes into account "improving the best" and "assisting the poor", which is conducive to comprehensively improving the quality of work. Summary of examination paper inspection work 2

Teaching quality is the lifeline of the school. In order to further strengthen the management of examination links and promote the improvement of examination quality, the Academic Affairs Office has made inspection arrangements for the final examination papers of the second semester of the 20xx-2016 academic year. This time, the Academic Affairs Office conducted a random inspection of 40 courses in ten colleges and one department of the school. The inspection results are summarized as follows.

1. Basic situation

In this inspection, most teachers were able to prepare, test, mark and archive test papers in accordance with the requirements of the "Shangqiu University Test Paper Proposition and Marking Standards" manage. The examination materials for most courses are complete, neatly bound, the papers are neat, the corrections are careful, there are few errors, and the materials are standardized. However, problems still exist. Some teachers make serious mistakes in their corrections, and their awareness of the standards for reviewing test papers needs to be improved. Regarding the connotation of the test papers, the overall quality of the test questions has improved, but there is still room for improvement.

2. Existing problems

(1) Modify the score but not as required;

(2) The total score is wrong;

(3) The score of the small question is not written directly in front of the question number;

(4) The subjective question is scored zero, and zero points are not recorded in the answer area;

(5) Not Draw a penalty line ("_") directly below the incorrect answer to mark the deduction.