Legal analysis: the name of the contract is wrong, and it cannot be proved that the party signing the contract is himself. The contract is invalid, the name of the contract is wrong, and the contract should be re-signed.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 143 A civil juristic act that meets the following conditions is valid:

(1) The actor has corresponding capacity for civil conduct;

(2) the meaning is true;

(three) does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and does not violate public order and good customs.

Article 153 A civil juristic act that violates the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations is invalid. However, unless mandatory provisions do not invalidate civil legal acts. A civil legal act that violates public order and good customs is invalid.

Article 154 A civil legal act in which the actor colludes with the counterpart in bad faith and damages the legitimate rights and interests of others is invalid.

Article 155 A civil juristic act that is invalid or revoked is not legally binding from the beginning.

Article 156 If part of a civil juristic act is invalid and does not affect the validity of other parts, the other parts are still valid.